Search for: "Masse v. Masse" Results 3761 - 3780 of 10,243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2016, 3:11 pm by Harold O'Grady
The latest acquisition, MacCarthy on Impeachment: How to Find and Use These Weapons of Mass Destruction (Call No. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 11:43 am by Price Felker
Hogue pressed upon the importance of the election for preserving Roe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 9:30 am by azatty
I’ve thought about that question a lot as I passed a beautiful hulking mass of a building in downtown Phoenix for more than 10 years. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:02 pm by Michael Rushford
Public Safety Realignment) allowing the early release of thousands of state prison inmates, Associate Justice Alito wrote a dissent in the Supreme Court case of Brown v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady refused a number of applications in the case of Otuo v Morley. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 3:50 pm by Bill Otis
"  In other words, it makes crystal  clear that McAuliffe intends to attempt to do by poorly disguised indirection what the Court has forbidden, to wit, grant a mass  pardon. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:04 am by INFORRM
  The question is important for the regimes that triggered the references, but in the background is a larger question: can mass retention of data ever being human rights compliant. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 3:27 am by familoo
The judge heard evidence over seven days and read a mass of material. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Representatives Kevin Brady (R-Texas) and Richard Neal (D-Mass.) argued for replacing the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP), an amendment to the Social Security Act that reduces payments for people whose careers involved work in both the public and private sectors. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
The European Court of Human Rights recently delivered a damning judgment in Zakharov v Russia [2015] ECHR 1065) (see Inforrm’s post here)  holding that the Russian state’s mass surveillance scheme was an unlawful interference with the Applicant’s Article 10 rights and is set to consider the issue again in a case brought by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism with interventions from several major media organisations. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 12:17 pm by Melinda L. McLellan and Jenna N. Felz
Perhaps responding to such critiques, European Commissioner for Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality Věra Jourová said, “I urge you not to simply dismiss this mechanism before it has even been put to the test. [read post]