Search for: "People v High"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 15,042
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2020, 8:32 am
” At the Harvard Law Review Blog, Aaron Tang suggests that there is an issue lurking in Espinoza v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 6:08 am
" These free expression protections have special status and will inform the high industry standards of professional diligence required for obtaining licenses and establishing preventive measures (Art 17(4)). [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:10 pm
Because the guy is totally high. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 12:38 pm
For abstract ideas, the Examiners must determine whether the claim falls into at least one of three enumerated categories: (1) “mathematical concepts” (mathematical relationships, mathematical formulas or equations, mathematical calculations); (2) “certain methods of organizing human activity” (fundamental economic principles or practices, commercial or legal interactions, managing personal behavior or relationships or interactions between people); and (3)… [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 11:13 am
The 1975 judgment in S v Hartmann is a comparable case. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:01 am
" Rosado v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 4:29 am
KenyaEG v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm
Part of having transparency in the tax code is having the people’s representatives decide if there will be a tax increase. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, February 4, 2020, at 10:00 a.m.: Governance Studies at The Brookings Institution will convene a panel of policy experts to discuss President Trump’s 2020 State of the Union address to Congress and the nation. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 8:14 pm
The English High Court of Justice decision in Seadrill Ghana Operations Ltd v Tullow Ghana Ltd also illustrates how common law courts internationally might treat a force majeure claim. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Dame Frances Cairncross led an independent review into the sustainability of high-quality journalism in the UK which was published in February last year. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 5:57 am
I n September 2019, in R (Bridges) v The Chief Constable of South Wales, the High Court ruled that the use of FRT by South Wales Police was, in those specific instances, lawful (the case was brought by Ed Bridges, a member of the public, who believed his image had been captured on FRT from a police van whilst he was shopping in Cardiff city centre). [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 10:47 am
Carroll v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 7:54 am
In Qualcomm v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 6:09 am
Aside from the tax issue addressed herein (and people used to say 1/3 for the husband, 1/3 for the wife and 1/3 for the government – though the numbers never actually worked that way), what is the justification for giving the income earner more than the recipient in light of Crews v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am
” In an op-ed at Newsweek, Alida Garcia warns that “[ICE] admits it is reopening previously closed removal cases of DACA recipients, [which] could allow [the agency] to start detaining and deporting people as quickly as possible if the Supreme Court gives it the green light” in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 12:42 pm
” U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:52 pm
So we are being treated to the back-and-forth especially as to how to interpret the truly unfortunate phrase "high crimes and misdemeanor. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:55 am
Baidu case (here), where the Beijing High Court addressed the copyright issues of an AI-generated work. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:15 pm
As I wrote at the time, those documents were high level and vague, and the board’s power would depend on practical and operational matters. [read post]
