Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 39,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2024, 1:09 pm
I often recommend the people read particular opinions that are doctrinally complicated or that contain factually interesting material. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 1:36 pm
Yes, the statute says that people can only be ordered to "attend before them . . . as a witness," and the Ninth Circuit agrees that means at an actual hearing. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
This may seem bizarre to those of us who believe that one of the primary functions of unelected constitutional courts is the protection of vulnerable minorities from majoritarian excesses. [read post]
23 May 2025, 7:54 am
" People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 9:44 am
Mildred Loving, a plaintiff in the landmark case Loving v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:05 pm
When people hear the word “discrimination,” they may often associate it with historically marginalized groups, like people of color, women, LGBT+ people, and so forth. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:19 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
Unsurprisingly, people may bristle at such compulsion. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:00 am
STATE V. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:28 am
Two people who are generally sympatico nonetheless going at it in their respective opinions. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:01 am
It may be easy for some people to think that weekly savings of less than $2 are no burden. [read post]
16 May 2016, 10:52 am
Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:01 pm
In Osarczuk v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:09 pm
While this case, Anderson v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:26 pm
§1983, which allows people to sue in federal court for deprivation of their constitutional rights. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 2:24 pm
That's not clear; compare Cavanaugh v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 4:36 am
In the old days, people sometimes bought games because of appealing box designs, but threw them away after an hour or so of playing.If impulse purchases were banned, and with Apple having made it pretty much impossible to make serious money on iOS with in-game advertising, the business model might shift to subscriptions--which Apple would probably even prefer.That said, it definitely is interesting when a federal judge dealing with a case like Epic v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 2:27 am
Should the Supreme Court feel that the art 5 point is unclear, they may opt to make a preliminary reference to the CJEU. [read post]
