Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 6,179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2014, 9:40 am
Colbert, et al v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
In Gertz v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm
But they would no longer be the sole ISPs in the neighborhoods they serve. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:28 am
Many years ago (in the 1960s) one or more people, including one Frank Petrella, wrote a screenplay about the boxer Jake LaMotta. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
A meaningful engagement of Charter rights with housing and anti-poverty strategies need not rely on the courts as the sole trustees of rights. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:32 am
Supreme Court victory in Rothgery v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 2:07 pm
This forever changed people’s expectations of the value of an image. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm
Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
Some people really needa triangular headrest ... [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:07 am
In the first two instance decisions, the District and Appeal Courts of Milan also acknowledged that the use of the "Ferrari" and "Ferrari Club" trade marks by the Club was atypical, non-distinctive of Ferrari S.p.A. and only eligible to communicate to the relevant public the existence of an association of people supporting Ferrari. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 5:34 pm
However, as the guidance states, “depending on the facts and circumstances, an employer may be able to justify a targeted criminal records screen solely under the Green factors. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 3:23 am
According to EEOC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:33 pm
'Cause that's in fact the Muslim way.Let's stipulate that your sole intent in having this conversation was in fact to try to persuade the guy to resolve the dispute civilly. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 4:26 am
If this were not the case it would be tantamount to limiting the right to privacy, and would introduce an unreasonable burden on its owner who would be forced to bring legal action, solely in order to avoid his passivity being considered a waiver of a specific aspect of his privacy. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm
A “significant effect on the environment” under CEQA requires a physical change in the environment caused by a project, and such a change may be deemed significant based solely on its impact on people. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
That provision gives the official proponent the power to “supervise” any legal defense provided by the Attorney General, and the power to hire, at public expense, outside counsel who will then be made “Special Deputy Attorney General,” to defend the measure if the proponent, in his “sole determination,” feels that the Attorney General is “not providing an adequate defense. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:34 am
The Supreme Court of Canada last week, in Cinar Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
