Search for: "S. Sherman"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 5,995
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Reason was that the answer by the European Court of Justice (Arsenal Football Club plc vs Matthew Reed) on whether non-origin-related use could constitute trademark infringement, was considered uncertain and controversial by UK professors Lionel Bently and Brad Sherman. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:54 pm
” This release references Sherman v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:16 am
Mark Sherman's AP report begins:WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court declined Wednesday to extend constitutional safeguards against the use of... [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
The Court’s summary affirmance in Bluman v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:26 pm
En otras palabras, de acuerdo al Fiscal de Distrito de Collin County, una familia o grupo de amigos no puede visitar a familia o a amigos en otro pueblo después de la 1:00a.m. sin primero investigar estadísticas de crimen del area para asegurar que no aparezcan como criminales. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:01 am
" You can access at this link the transcript of today's U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 9:00 am
In the case that involved the Murphy Police Department, prosecutors argued that there was a legal basis for stopping the defendant in a residential area because (a) there had been five vehicle burglaries in the area during the past year; (b) it was 1:00 in the morning; (c) the officer saw the defendant's brake lights activate, the headlights come on, and the vehicle immediately drove away; (d) the license plate came back registered to a person residing in a nearby town,… [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:46 am
” Kevin Russell recently previewed Wednesday’s argument in Coleman v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:23 am
Sherman, Student Intern.Date of Decision: January 5, 2012Facts: This is an appeal from a district court order reimposing sentence after the appellant’s probation was revoked. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:52 am
At the National Law Journal (via Law.com), Clark Neily and Paul Sherman urge the Court to grant cert. in Locke v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:31 am
What’s actually illegal under § 2 of the Sherman Act is “the possession of monopoly power in the relevant market and the willful acquisition or maintenance of that power as distinguished from growth or development as a consequence of a superior product, business acumen, or historic accident. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 10:41 pm
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting National Law Journal op-ed from Clark Neily and Paul Sherman of the Institute for Justice, about a case of theirs, Locke v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:13 pm
A great way to see what's hot and find fodder for your own next article or post.Also see our newest blog featuring roundups of consumer and personal law news: Is That Legal? [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 6:57 am
In an op-ed for the New York Times, Paul Sherman discusses Bluman v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:21 pm
Nothing in the pleadings indicated the individuals’ relationship to the defending entities or their ability to act—or even attend the meetings at issue—on behalf of the entities, the court observed.Companies that licensed the right to place their branded label on certain growers’ potatoes, the marketing agent for several of the growers, and dehydrators that participated in a joint venture further down the supply chain could not be found liable under the Sherman Act… [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 2:36 am
To extend Senator Lee’s questioning, “cooking” YouTube search results could also raise legitimate concerns under the Federal Trade Commission Act as well as the Sherman Act. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:37 pm
Why Worry, When There Are Safeguards You Can Take Now - Michelle Sherman out of Sheppard Mullin's Los Angeles offices on the firm's Social Media Law Update Blog The Top 10 Most Intriguing Federal Securities Litigation Stories in 2011 (Part 1 of 2) - Washington, DC attorney William McGrath of Porter Wright on the firm's Federal Securities Law Blog Balancing Conflicts Between Work And Religion - Los Angeles lawyers Pilar Morin… [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:24 am
She also declined to reach Rule 23(b)’s predominance requirement. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:43 am
USDA’s Wildlife Services program routinely uses tax dollars to poison wildlife, shoot them from helico [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 10:13 am
Nevins In “the latest installment in a contentious litigation”, defendant Research In Motion recently obtained an order granting its motion to dismiss plaintiff Eatoni's claims that RIM violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act and equivalent portions of New York’s Donnelly Act. [read post]
