Search for: "STATE v. BROWN" Results 3761 - 3780 of 8,796
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2008, 12:12 pm
Many, like Barbara Johns, the 16-year-old at the center of a student protest that led eventually to the Prince Edward County, Virginia case that became part of Brown v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 4:59 am
  The panel provided a brief reminder of the key UK and CJEU cases dealing with the meaning of (1) an act of “communication” and (2) a “public”, both in the context of re-transmission of broadcast signals (SGAE v Rafael Hotels Case C-306/05, SCF v Marco Del Corso Case C-135/10, ITV v TV Catchup Case C-607/11 and Reha Training v GEMA Case C-117/5) and P2P networks (Polydor v… [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 10:00 am by Anthony Zaller
This Friday’s Five covers five employment law developments that occurred in August 2015 that will have an impact for employers in California. 1)     NLRB ruling widens which companies may be considered “joint employers” In a 3-2 decision, the NLRB ruled that Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. was a joint employer with a staffing agency, Leadpoint Business Services, and therefore the employees of Leadpoint have bargaining rights with… [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am by Lawrence Solum
Following his reading of Brown, Chief Justice Warren read his opinion for the Court in Bolling v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:25 am by David Cosgrove
[v]Some don’t consider this the fail-safe that the government is touting it to be. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 10:55 am by Matt Cooper
Representing two same-sex California couples who want to marry, former solicitor general Theodore Olson urged the court to overturn the initiative, likening the case to Brown v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 8:16 am by Jon Sands
The prisoner's complaint failed to state a claim.U.S. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  As did his colleague a year ago in the oral argument in State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 3:43 am
The court held that the cleric-penitent privilege did not apply to the facts at hand:In its opinion yesterday in State v. [read post]