Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 3761 - 3780 of 6,064
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
…You may owe re-sale right royalties | BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court unanimously dismisses Warner-Lambert's painful Lyrica appeal | Why is this Kat laughing (hint: it's all about his blue shirt)? [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 9:27 pm by David Kopel
Young three times quotes the Supreme Court's 1897 Robertson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Similarly, exacerbates tension on First Amendment interests b/c we have a merchandising claim at work—Court’s intuition that he should win does real damage to Rogersby finding the use artistically relevant, but also finding that b/c we’re in the same (merchandising) market, it might be explicitly misleading even though the defendant isn’t doing anything explicitly misleading.Porous markets: Excelled Sheepskin v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 10:17 pm
" Sales figures alone "may be misleading and must be placed in some context in determining the fame of a mark. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:25 pm by Brad Pauley
The Supreme Court ordered the Committee of Bar Examiners to show cause why Sergio C. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 9:33 am
But, no claim seems to have been made by Naim under s. 14 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 for an order for sale - next steps, no doubt. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Federal Court of Appeal Provides Guidance in Apotex v Allergan 2016 FCA 155 https://t.co/X4KUlDUe5z -> How soon will the Irish government approve copyright reform? [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 6:18 am by Alden Abbott
 The FTC will argue that C&S has insufficient experience in retail-grocery sales to successfully run the stores, and will cite failed grocery divestitures involving other firms in prior mergers. [read post]