Search for: "Shields v. State"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 5,117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2011, 6:02 am
Image via WikipediaThe United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit yesterday upheld its 2008 ruling that the Federal Communications Commission acted "arbitrarily and capriciously" when it fined CBS Corp. $550,000 for airing the 2004 Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime wardrobe malfunction that caused Justin Timberlake to bare Janet Jackson's breast for an entire nine-sixteenths of a second (see "TUOL" post 9/17/09).As reported by the Associated Press, the same 3rd… [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 2:04 pm
(Eugene Volokh) That’s what seems to be the holding of Gilbert v. 7355 South Shore Condominium Ass’n & Shelley Norton (Chi. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:22 am
State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
” State v. [read post]
Appellate Court Strikes Facebook Disclosure Order for “All” Records; Lower Court Forced to Do Review
28 Oct 2011, 8:19 am
V. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:47 am
In Rehberg v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:37 pm
Like Vance v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:35 pm
Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:31 pm
Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:37 am
” The court also stated that Donnell v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 12:09 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 9:13 am
United States, Dkt. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:42 am
v=43f2bBjGi_8 Now, that’s quite a quirky repertory, and it stands in favorable comparison to Tom’s: the periodic table, plagiarism, pollution, the new math, the Vatican II conference, and of course the silent letter ‘e’. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Ad [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:24 pm
The case is Masciandaro v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 9:22 am
Bonnano v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am
Many of us have been entertained in recent weeks by the Tory shield munchers (or beserkers as I now refer to them) who rule over us. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:26 am
“This ecologically important species is being unfairly targeted out of ignorance and intolerance and now lack a federal shield from being killed. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
The court also cited Paul's "admission" that his desire to shield assets from his wife because of marital difficulties motivated his granting shares to his son. [read post]
