Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 3761 - 3780 of 8,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2012, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
  Judges are more willing to allow expert testimony on various subjects, like “gun focus” (the tendence of a witness to focus on a gun, rather than the gun holder’s features) or cross-racial identifications, and even allow for state funding of it. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:56 am
While this Kat was taking part to the outstanding EIPIN congress in Alicante, he became aware of the fresh decision by the Madrid Court of Appeal in YouTube v Telecinco of 14 January 2014 [Madrid Court of Appeal decision No 11/2014, available here; non-official English translation kindly provided by the Kat-friend Carolina Pina (Garrigues Madrid) available here; the IPKat's note on the first instance decision here]. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 9:46 am by Mark Weidemaier
A judgment is a judicial decree entitling the judgment-holder to invoke the coercive legal machinery of the state. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:49 pm by Erin Miller
Holder (09-203): originally listed with Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 12:45 pm by Thompson & Knight LLP
Walker (the “Walker Declaration”), Linn Energy has entered into a restructuring support agreement with holders of more than 66.67% of issued debt. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
The Supreme Court heard oral argument this morning in Golan v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:22 am by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2019) This is an important case for anyone arguing secondary indicia — not a good case for patent holders. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm by Richard Hasen
Holder, which in striking down a part of the Voting Rights Act freed states with a history of racial discrimination in voting from having to get approval before making further changes to their voting rules, states with Republican legislatures began enacting more restrictive voting rules. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am by Camilla Hrdy
In the course of this work I encountered Section 1905 in the following way.There was, and still is, a federal law on the books enacted in 2007 called the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act that mandates that important information from the majority of significant clinical trials run in the United States be published on the National Institute of Health (NIH) website. [read post]