Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2014, 7:45 am
Holder (2d Cir. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 4:15 am
In Nguyen v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 9:31 am
Note that marijuana is still a controlled substance under federal law but that Attorney General Eric Holder announced guidelines for prosecutors in states with medical marijuana laws, making it clear that the focus of federal resources is not on individuals whose actions comply with state marijuana laws. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
And Arnold J found that users infringe by copying and communicating the Claimant's works to the public and also found that the website operators infringe by communicating those works to the public - and here held that in the case of the 13 target websites, it is a communication to a new public, "...which is to say a public which was not considered by the rights holders concerned when they authorised the original communication or other act of dissemination of the… [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
In Iris Corp. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 12:10 pm
” (Compare Doe v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:17 pm
And, had the balance of the account stayed at $4000, either by means of additional purchases or if the account holder paid only enough to cover accrued interest, Dell would receive approximately $1120 per year in interest alone. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 5:52 am
See Arizona State Board for Charter Schools v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 2:28 pm
On Tuesday, the child plaintiffs in J.E.F.M. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:20 am
(also captioned v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm
You may not have heard of the lawsuit Hurrell-Harring v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
In the first case, Mellouli v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 3:30 am
One rather dramatic example of a collateral tax sanction comes from the Supreme Court’s 2012 decision in Kawashima v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 3:51 pm
In Vermont v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 3:51 pm
In Vermont v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm
4) ISPs should bear implementation costs ... and may think of preventative filtering as a cheaper solutionSimilarly to what stated in his earlier judgment in 20C Fox v BT (No 2), Arnold J took the view that "the rightholders should pay the costs of an unopposed application ... [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Holder, (Columbia Law Review, Forthcoming).Steven G. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
McDaniel v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
Essentially, patent holders may ‘treaty shop’ for the most favourable international investment agreement available: It may well be quite a number of such treaties that are binding upon UPCA Contracting Member States and that offer investor-state dispute settlement.This highlights the potential for international investment law and in particular its system of dispute settlement to interfere with national court decisions and other state measures affecting… [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:13 am
Many roads lead to Rome, i.e., API freedom.The Oracle v. [read post]
