Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 3761 - 3780
of 29,868
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Jubelirer (in 2004) and Gaffney v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 7:57 am
In the September 2015 decision of State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 9:34 am
State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 11:53 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:28 am
(quoting Berger v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 6:41 pm
Last week, the Sixth Circuit, on the government's motion, published the previously unpublished decision in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 2:26 pm
With regard to the competence of the European Union to take such restrictive measures, the Regulation explains that they ‘fall within the scope of the Treaty and, therefore, in particular with a view to ensuring their uniform application in all Member States, regulatory action at the level of the Union is necessary’. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:18 am
At The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses Wednesday’s argument in Endrew F. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:55 pm
The nature of the balancing exercise has been the subject of lengthy judicial consideration at the highest level of domestic courts (see, for example, R(Razgar) v SSHD [2004] UKHL 27 and Huang v SSHD [2007] UKHL 11) and it is right that the interest to be balanced against that of Mr Ibrahim and his family is that of the general public or society, not of individual members of it. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:13 am
”) United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:41 am
[Baures v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:33 pm
A recent federal district court opinion, Howard v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:03 pm
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 7:15 am
Would it improve protection for important rights at the state level? [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:24 am
Now we may start to see if plaintiffs can evade this by proceeding at a state class level in cases not removable under CAFA. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 9:52 am
This week the 9th Circuit heard arguments in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 12:35 pm
Honeycutt v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:37 am
Held v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:12 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 4:36 am
I'll go into more detail on that part in the coming days, subject to whatever else will happen, such as a potential new round of Ericsson v. [read post]
