Search for: "State v. Losee"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 14,724
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2015, 9:56 am
With Kochhar v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 3:20 am
Speaking of the 10th District, last week in State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 8:34 am
In the Panetti [v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 2:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
Certainly the momentousness of, say, Bush v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 8:52 am
In my view, a case like Gonzales v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 11:58 pm
The customer wanted a cheap policy and a "proof of insurance" form that it could show to cops and anyone else, so rather than lose the sale, the insurance company sold him the thing and issued the (false) proof of insurance.If you let that happen -- as the Court of Appeal does -- then plenty of people will do precisely that. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 1:07 pm
"The Ninth Circuit agrees with the district court that these statistics and underlying data state a valid Fair Housing Act claim. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:59 am
As factors indicating oppressiveness, Eagles quotes the Tenth Circuit’s list but states in the alternative, quoting (see id. at 729) our opinion in S Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 11:59 am
Facts of the Case In the recent (unreported) case of Davenport v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
One of the most extensive modern political-question discussions by the Supreme Court came in the 1993 Supreme Court ruling of Nixon v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 4:28 pm
In Kleindienst v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 9:38 am
See, e.g., Pratt v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 1:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 1:01 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 5:26 am
The outcome in Garza v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:41 pm
"At which point both the Legislature and the California Supreme Court get involved.The Legislature doesn't like losing, so it passes a new law, which is expressly designed to abrogate the Court of Appeal's holding. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:41 am
” Scott v. [read post]
