Search for: "State v. R. G." Results 3761 - 3780 of 4,524
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP finance) The UK IP Office issues a Virgin trademark ruling that contrasts the Israel approach (IP Factor) EWHC (Pat): Article 27 (to prevent parallel proceedings in different member states) requires flexible approach to meaning of ‘same parties’: Mölnlycke Health Care AB (MAB), Mölnlycke Health care Limited (MUK) v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 5:46 pm by Erik Gerding
Google v China: Do we know corporate social responsibility when we see it? [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:57 am by Rosalind English
The situation in this case was to be distinguished from the one obtaining in Alconbury Developments Ltd, Re (2003) 2 AC 295 and R (on the application of Holding & Barnes Plc) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2001) UKHL 23, (2003) 2 AC 295, and Bryan v United Kingdom (1995) 21 EHRR 342. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:33 am
Increasing the compensation of the State’s judiciaryLarabee v Governor of the State of New York, 65 AD3d 74Two Family Court Judges, a Civil Court Judge and a Criminal Court Judge, whose salaries are specified in Judiciary Law § 221-e and § 221-g, initiated litigation naming the Governor, the New York State Senate, the State Assembly, and the State of New York as defendants.The judges seek redress [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:24 am by sally
R (G) v Governors of X School (Secretary of State for Children and Schools and Families intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 1; [2010] WLR (D) 4 “Where an individual was subject to two or more sets of proceedings, or phases of a single proceeding, and a civil right or obligation enjoyed or owed by him would be determined in one of them, he could (but not necessarily would), by force of art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental… [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm by Dr. Mark Lee Levine
If the taxpayer anticipates “selling’ a property to complete the exchange, the taxpayer must acquire a property that is otherwise qualified and within Code §1031, as stated, above. [read post]