Search for: "State v. Register" Results 3761 - 3780 of 13,696
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 9:05 pm
Plaintiff Nationwide Handyman, LLC alleges ownership of the federally-registered NATIONWIDE HANDYMAN trademark, the same being registered with the State of Maryland as a corporate name. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 4:06 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The 1974 Supreme Court decision O’Brien v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 9:35 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v MM (Scotland) was heard on 9th April. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which it will consider whether last Term’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:25 pm by Matthew David Brozik
I can’t write a better introductory sentence than Judge Andrew Carter of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York did to open his May 20, 2013, order and opinion in Blagman v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 11:25 am by Bill Amadeo
Generically speaking, all securities sold in a particular state must either be registered there or be exempt from registration; and all broker-dealers and their representatives must be registered there or be exempt from registration. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 3:53 am
"TorrentSpy has announced its intention to appeal the recent denial.The Register (UK) Article: LINKTorrentSpy v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:55 am
It argued that its registered mark should be considered as a whole, stating: SPAM and SPAM ARREST are not seen as essentially the same. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:21 am by Sahithya Muralidharan
It would be interesting to see if the plaintiff appeals this decision before the Supreme Court of India. *********** [1] Tea Board, India v ITC Limited, (C.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 2:37 pm by Adam Schwartz
In the wake of this year’s Supreme Court decision in Dobbs overruling Roe v. [read post]