Search for: "State v. Settle"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 15,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2011, 2:23 pm
Case: M Waikiki v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:30 am
You know that the adjuster has to pay you something until you either settle or die. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
State, 168 N.E.2d 372, 373 (N.Y. 1960). [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 9:01 am
State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 11:57 am
While the appeal's pending, Cora settles for a million bucks.You'd think that'd be the end of it. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 2:13 am
In Runyon v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 12:05 pm
Tan paid $1.5 million to settle class action claims under BIPA after plaintiffs alleged that L.A. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 3:50 pm
Demonstrators on each side of United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
After settling with the driver, the Plaintiffs proceeded to trial against the State. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:15 pm
The case, Lee v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 8:14 am
In Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:33 am
Following its loss in the Supreme Court, AnimalFeeds International has voluntarily dismissed its antitrust action – Stolt-Nielsen S.A. et al. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
In Kiobel v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 6:13 pm
From Burghardt v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 7:53 am
The court cited Mutual Assurance, Inc. v Madden, 627 So. 2d 865 (Ala. 1993) as it related to settling bad faith claims. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:05 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 2:17 am
This reduced the value of Part 36 offers in the IPEC and, arguably, made it harder to settle cases.The other side of thePart 36 rainbowSince those cases, the Court of Appeal has considered the impact of fixed costs on Part 36 offers (Broadhurst v Tan [2016] EWCA Civ 94). [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:55 pm
Last month in Williams v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:57 am
In Desrosiers v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
May 14, 1992).Another fact pattern favorable to removal (but a lot less common) is where the plaintiff settles with the medical malpractice defendants during the pendency of a review panel’s activity under §40:1299.47. [read post]
