Search for: "State v. So "
Results 3761 - 3780
of 117,850
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2011, 4:01 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:50 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:09 pm
In the case Batson v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 12:18 pm
So, as a direct result of the state's failure, criminal charges against various defendants are dismissed.This is one of those rare cases in which the highest tribunal of a state rightly grants review to make clear that the lower courts are right and that an executive-level official (here, the Riverside DA) should stop making contrary claims. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:47 pm
I would not embark on so unwise an adventure, and would affirm the Florida Supreme Court's decision. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
In so far as the Court of Appeal’s approach qualifies the guidance in Bolton, this does not give rise to any error of law since that decision is itself no more than guidance as to practice. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 6:09 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
Case citation: Rupp v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:35 pm
This decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:11 am
Below are links to the complete series of my posts on Trump v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am
But there are so many issues that the justices probably needed the extra month just to sort it all out. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:20 pm
In Tann v Bennett, --- Fed. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
(People v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:15 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
§ 2254(d) by readily attributing error to the state court in violation of Woodford v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:05 pm
The Case of Navarette v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 10:55 am
Whether Judge Ronnie Abrams will follow suit, of course, remains to be seen, but Pacira has Second Circuit precedent—United States v. [read post]
