Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. " Results 3761 - 3780 of 8,925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 2:54 pm by Sean Patrick Donlan
A lawsuit, however, was brought in the United States, relying on the Alien Tort Statute—part of a Judiciary Act from 1789. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court affirmed a lower-court judgment holding that Congress properly delegated authority in the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act to the U.S. attorney general to apply the law’s registration requirements, suggests that “[t]he more conservative justices, aligned with the dissent, favor disciplining the administrative state but not the national security president. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Oracle America Inc., which asks whether copyright protection extends to software interfaces. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:56 am
Constitution reads as follows: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 7:00 am by Jordan Brunner
David Bosco outlined the options that the United States has for responding to ICC scrutiny in Afghanistan and J. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:19 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Bush brought together Republicans and Democrats as he signed a 25-year extension of a law exemplifying "our continued commitment to a united America where every person is valued and treated with dignity and respect." [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
When Ralls filed suit alleging violations of due process and the Administrative Procedure Act, President Obama himself issued a similar order demanding that Ralls divest and stating that he had “credible evidence” that Ralls’ actions might “impair the national security of the United States. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:58 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
§ 10(a).Although the courts have recognized certain common law exceptions for vacating an arbitration award, See Footnote 3 the United States Supreme Court recently held that the grounds listed in the statute are the exclusive grounds for vacating an arbitration award under the FAA. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:38 am
" * * * Cavel International, the plaintiff in this case, owns and operates the only facility in the United States for slaughtering horses. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:16 pm by Walter Olson
The Supreme Court has noticed the issue as well: At the Supreme Court, SYG dates back to the 1895 case of Beard v. [read post]