Search for: "US v. Miller" Results 3761 - 3780 of 4,242
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2025, 5:50 am by John Mikhail
A simple search confirms that this phrase is never used—not once—in either Elk or United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 7:28 am
Coordinators are active advocates who use their personal resources. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:39 am by Rob Robinson
§1920 – bit.ly/HewRoz (Mark Sidoti) PhotoCop & The Red Light of Admissibility - bit.ly/H18QVF (Josh Gilliland) Pippins v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
June 2019 might become known in Illinois as the month the state legalized marijuana use, but I hope it remains better remembered as the 100th anniversary of Illinois’ ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment—the provision in the Constitution that prohibited discrimination in voting on account of sex. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 11:49 am by Patricia Hughes
But it may be because I have the concept of “coup” on my mind that I am tempted to describe West Whitby Landowners Group Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:02 am by Gilles Cuniberti
But although the economic effect of Miller/Macfarlane may have much in common with community of property, it is clear that the exercise under the 1973 Act does not relate to a matrimonial property regime: cf Case C-220/95 Van den Boogaard v Laumen (Case C-220/95) [1997] ECR I-1147, [1997] QB 759; Agbaje v Agbaje [2010] UKSC 13, [2010] 2 WLR 709, para 57. 108. [read post]