Search for: "United States v. Heard" Results 3761 - 3780 of 8,389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2016, 5:45 pm by Kent Scheidegger
However, this subsection shall not be construed to authorize the introduction of any evidence secured in violation of the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Florida. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 12:50 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (C) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 October 2015. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
But Linroy Bottoson nonetheless stands for something exceedingly important about the death penalty in the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
On 19 January 2016, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 10:22 am by Guest Blogger
Zachary Price            The Supreme Court heard arguments last week in Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 6:55 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
There were those who felt the federal disability program should not be administrated by the United States Social Security Administration (SSA) as they were seen as an unnecessary middleman. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 11:42 pm by Mark Summerfield
Back in November 2015, the Australian Patent Office issued the first published decision to consider enhanced requirements for patent specifications that were introduced by the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Act 2012: CSR Building Products Limited v United States Gypsum Company [2015] APO 72.The decision arises from an opposition by CSR Building Products Limited to the grant of a patent on an application by United States Gypsum… [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:28 pm
On January 5, 2016, the California Supreme Court, at the request of the Ninth Circuit United States Court of Appeals, heard oral argument in two cases alleging that the employers failed to provide seating to their employees as required by California law. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 2:37 pm
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 2:37 pm by Kelly Johnson
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm by Steve Gottlieb
But on the floor a motion was made to make the point indisputable: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am by Amy Howe
There is still more coverage of and commentary on United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Part I of this paper analyzes the ways that researchers, particularly in the United States, have attempted to define and identify cases of wrongful conviction. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 12:48 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
 We’re talking about the jurisdiction of the United States as well. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:50 am by Jason C. Gavejian
Today, in a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:55 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court announced that it had granted review in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:30 am by Randy Barnett
 But is this theory applicable to the President of the United States? [read post]