Search for: "United States v. Herring" Results 3761 - 3780 of 23,686
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2015, 1:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
In the wave of court rulings following the Supreme Court’s July 2013 ruling in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 8:13 am by Trevor Covey
Garrett et al, Pauline Shuler’s heirs appealed the decision of the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee dismissing their negligence and medical battery claims stemming from Shuler’s death at Intensive Care Unit of Baptist Memorial Hospital-Memphis. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 2:57 pm
The Supreme Court stated in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 11:59 am by Kevin Johnson
Arguing on behalf of the United States, Assistant to the Solicitor General Rachel Kovner seemed to make somewhat inconsistent arguments. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Supreme Court makes it clear that absent "exceptional circumstances," the Thirteenth Amendment bars compulsory labor "enforced by the use or threatened use of physical or legal coercion," citing United States v Kozminski 487 US 931 and a number of other cases. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 10:04 pm
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit issued an order denying rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:45 am by Tiffany Blofield
United States National Pageant, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]