Search for: "United States v. Lively"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 11,370
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 12:43 pm
This post focuses on the Court's invalidation of Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act.]In United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:44 pm
--Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of FloridaOpinion Date: 5/13/10Cite: Concrete Surface Innovations, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 4:30 am
" Kitson v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:56 am
However, on March 31, 2010, the United States Supreme Court filed its decision in Padilla v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:11 am
If you live in the states covered by the 6th U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 9:05 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
” As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
Thus, the state of Maryland did not offend the United States Constitution when it denied counsel to Mr. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Williams Cos. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 6:25 am
In Part III, the article explains Supremacy Clause doctrine and distinguishes the Supreme Court’s opinion in Goldstein v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 10:16 am
” “With large numbers of people living in close proximity to one another, many of them elderly or living with chronic diseases, DOJ must act now to save lives. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
Lives were saved. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:00 am
Keep an eye on the case of State v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 9:24 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2006, 7:15 am
" In State v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 4:06 pm
King v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 9:46 pm
One short year after publication, in 2010, Anti-Corruption Principle was relied upon by Justice Stevens in his Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:48 am
United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:54 am
" In practice, it's hard to find cases where such a standard would likely change the outcome; but Thursday's Washington Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
