Search for: "X, Y "
Results 3761 - 3780
of 4,308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
If some thing is possible, say event X, we say that X occurs in some possible world. [read post]
23 May 2010, 4:35 am
If some thing is possible, say event X, we say that X occurs in some possible world. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 2:53 pm
If some thing is possible, say event X, we say that X occurs in some possible world. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 8:38 am
If some thing is possible, say event X, we say that X occurs in some possible world. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
It should therefore be up to the jury to decide whether Danielle acted reasonably in doing X or not doing Y, balancing the costs to her of complying with the demands against the benefits to Paul of avoiding Craig's violent attack. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 3:27 pm
UPDATE: In what came as a surprise to absolutely no one, this case was all but laughed out of court when it finally came before a judge. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 6:03 am
If some thing is possible, say event X, we say that X occurs in some possible world. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:52 am
by NYU Journal of International Law and Politics In response to the online symposium on LGBT asylum and refugee law held two weeks ago by the NYU Journal of International Law & Politics and Opinio Juris, the Journal received several additional pieces of commentary. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:40 pm
[X, Y, Z] Perhaps there's an implicit enforcement threat, but it's pretty oblique. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
Rebecca Tushnet Bad Spaniels, Deceptive Raptors, and Tiny Hands: The Persistence of Commercial Speech as a Category Jennifer Rothman has done related work, but her focus has been on the different definitions of commerciality across IP regimes; I’m interested in a different question: holding constant the definition of commercial speech as defined by First Amendment jurisprudence, which is basically speech that does no more than merely propose a commercial transaction, does the Lanham Act cover… [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Similar to the Geneva prosecutor, the Swiss Customs Administration permitted the seized items to remain with Y. and X., and simply “prohibited the couple from disposing of them. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:31 pm
Copyright (and patent!) [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
Key Findings The Maryland General Assembly is on the verge of adopting a vaguely worded, legally dubious tax on digital advertising in the final days of this session—now paired with new tobacco taxes. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
Sec’y of Labor, 471 U.S. 290, 296 (1985) (quoting Mitchell v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 6:27 am
But it also focuses on wider context elaborated in the General Secretary’s "four urgent needs" (迫切需要; Pòqiè xūyào)[1] emphasized in his explanation of the 3rd Plenum Resolution/Decision. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 12:11 am
ratingsMatrix[user][movie] = sum (userFeature[f][user] * movieFeature[f][movie]) for f from 1 to 40 In matrix terms, the original matrix has been decomposed into two very oblong matrices: the 17,000 x 40 movie aspect matrix, and the 500,000 x 40 user preference matrix. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:52 am
The interest imputation rules recharacterize a portion of the selling price as interest, causing (x) the seller to have less capital gain and more ordinary income and (y) the buyer to have more interest expense and less amortizable tax basis. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:47 pm
On the basis of absolutely no actual information about what happened, this feels to me like a case in which Justice Breyer did a little horse-trading: “I’ll go along with you on Aereo (though only if I get to write the opinion, which will ensure that our ruling doesn’t have any serious anti-innovation or anti-competitive effects, and only if you join me in the X vs Y case . . . [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:52 pm
Morris conceded that moral gravity was not something that could be determined with scientific precision, but he argued that we could nonetheless usefully think about offense severity in terms of a range: this particular offense has at least X level of severity, but no greater than Y level. [read post]
