Search for: ""duty to warn""
Results 361 - 380
of 1,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2017, 2:04 pm
It held the defendant had no duty to warn or repair the driveway because the plaintiff knew of the condition of the driveway. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:52 pm
The claim further alleges that the hotel knew of the dangerous condition and had a duty to warn patrons of the condition. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 12:18 pm
In a recent opinion, the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland analyzed the scope of the duty to warn as it applies to a manufacturer of asbestos-containing products. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:05 am
The trucking company also argued the trial court erred in finding the defendant driver owed a duty to warn other motorists not only of his stopped truck but also of the deer, that the plaintiff failed to prove the negligence of the driver was the cause of her injuries, and that the jurors’ award of damages wasn’t supported by evidence presented at trial. [read post]
18 May 2017, 8:15 am
There is no duty to warn of a condition that is obvious. [read post]
15 May 2017, 3:00 am
Further, that Vita Food owed no duty to warn, that proximate cause could not be proven by Ovando and the acts of Ovando were contributorily negligent at more than 50% of the total proximate cause of his injuries. [read post]
7 May 2017, 8:23 pm
A drug manufacturer has a duty to warn of known dangers. [read post]
2 May 2017, 8:31 am
That said, manufacturers, restaurants and other distributors may have a duty to warn customers about allergens, per the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:46 am
The manufacturer also has a duty to warn consumers of any hidden dangers. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 11:28 am
The Pharmacy stated that a pharmacist has no duty to warn of potential hazards and is not liable for harm to patients from consuming drugs, provided the pharmacist accurately dispenses the medication. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 3:41 pm
While there is no duty to warn of obvious dangers on property, when a danger is so obvious that a person could reasonably be expected to see the danger, the condition itself is a warning, and the landowner needs to remedy or warn of the condition. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
Again, the Court held that there existed no special duty. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 9:24 am
At the very least, officials may have a duty to warn motorists about the potential danger. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 8:15 am
If there are hazards, the property owner/ manager has a duty to warn patrons about it so they can protect themselves. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 3:50 am
The defendant argued that it had no duty to warn the hospital of the known dangers, since it did warn the doctors who would be performing surgery. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
The Browns averred that the hole in the porch floor was open and obvious to all and thus, they had no duty to warn Ms. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:21 am
Because the lifeguards did not have knowledge of the rip tide when Balkaran was taken away from the shore and into the ocean, the Court declined to extend this “duty to warn” to the beachgoers. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:51 am
The woman filed a claim against the bank and its general contractor, alleging a breach of duty to warn and a breach of duty to maintain a safe location. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 9:18 am
An appellate court affirmed the earlier decision, finding manufacturer had no duty to warn the medical center because it had already warned the doctor. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:52 am
Contractor had no duty to warn, the court ruled, because the government knew at that time about the hazards of asbestos use. [read post]
