Search for: "*cooper v. Cooper" Results 361 - 380 of 11,557
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
The Group of 77 is the largest intergovernmental organization of developing countries in the United Nations, which provides the means for the countries of the South to articulate and promote their collective economic interests and enhance their joint negotiating capacity on all major international economic issues within the United Nations system, and promote South-South cooperation for development. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 5:35 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
There is however seldom a provision in the policy which specifically entitles the insured to reject a claim if there is no such cooperation. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am by R. Scott Adams
  Other reports have been released by DOD, DHS and others, attempting to draw lessons learned from a massive and chaotic refugee rescue operation, such as improved interagency cooperation and integrating more planning for worst-case scenarios. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
According to AITW, Cleveland breached the contract by failing to cooperate with the production of the film, instead signing on to produce a different documentary with Next Management, LLC (Next). [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Ben Sperry
Cooper, & Liang Zhong summarized the issue as follows: The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), and its implementing regulations, broadly prohibit operators of online services directed at children under 13 from collecting personal information without providing notice of its data collection and use practices and obtaining verifiable parental consent. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
POLICYHOLDER agrees to cooperate with PUBLIC ADJUSTER to be available for preparation of the claim, conferences, appraisal, and/or mediation, and to keep PUBLIC ADJUSTER fully informed on all matters relating to this LOSS. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 8:45 am by Michael Oykhman
R v de Freitas held that the Crown must prove more than the potential for endangerment and that the child was actually endangered. [read post]