Search for: "*u. S. v. Kennedy"
Results 361 - 380
of 733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2013, 10:16 am
Boca Raton, 524 U. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:14 am
But in Grutter v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:00 pm
Italian Colors Restaurant, 570 U. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:18 am
Cases like Rust v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 7:20 am
The Court’s answer is “yes. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Ball State University Et Al. (570 U. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 9:32 am
S. 420, 425, 427 (1984) (quoting United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
S. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 12:05 pm
Diamond v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:35 am
” 525 U. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:03 pm
United States, 335 U. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s oral argument on Tuesday in Perry v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:12 am
Dukes, 564 U. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 4:40 pm
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy and Thomas joined Justice Alito’s opinion. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 4:40 pm
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy and Thomas joined Justice Alito’s opinion. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
S. 410 (1945); Auer v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
S. 410 (1945); Auer v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:10 pm
., Vernor v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]