Search for: "*west v. U. S" Results 361 - 380 of 678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
 The most important enactments are those which amend a state’s constitution, as they are the highest expression of the people’s will. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:32 am
  We didn’t claim to be comprehensive or conclusive.It’s a “wild, wild west” legal issue, so we were predictably intrigued when the law review article, Park, “For A New Heart, Just Click Print:  The Effect on Medical & Products Liability from 3-D Printed Organs,” 2015 U. [read post]
22 May 2015, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
Recent Historical Stories on Constitution Daily Looking back at a key Supreme Court decision about gay rights The real-life namesake of Martin Sheen’sWest Wing’ president Plessy’s place in the list of worst Supreme Court decisions Looking back at the Brown v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:31 pm
Kreimer, Pervasive Image Capture and the First Amendment: Memory, Discourse, and the Right to Record, 159 U. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
  Finally, as we’ve blogged about before, West Virginia federal courts have recently cut back Karl to drug DTC advertising cases. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
 The High Court’s decision in Serdar Mohammed v Secretary of State for Defence (2015) further stretched the ECHR’s reach to Afghanistan. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:25 am by Jim Gerl
And see this old post.So along comes a case last year: Edward S & Virginia S ex rel TS v West Noble Sch Corporation 63 IDELR 34 (ND Ind. 3/31/14) After noting that dismissal with prejudice is an especially harsh sanction that should be used only as a last resort, the U. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 10:53 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
In that career he participated in marine construction and offshore oil production projects on the East, Gulf, and West Coasts of the U. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:39 pm
  Feldman also argued that “[u]nlike the program used in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:15 pm by Wells Bennett
If that’s the case then the plain language of Article V arguably could relieve Cuba from any treaty obligation to return her to the United States. [read post]