Search for: "A M v. Review Board" Results 361 - 380 of 2,593
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2019, 3:40 pm
  Seems to me to overstate the case by saying that all of these people necessarily "know the field" than, say, a professor of criminal justice who's worked in the area for 30 years, or a civilian member of the Police Review Board (or maybe even a criminal defense attorney) who's had a quarter century of exposure to a wide variety of police practice.And that's probably even true for candidates with actual police experience. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 8:46 am by Dennis Crouch
  The Board relied particularly on the Federal Circuit’s non-precedential decision in Cyber settle, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 1:10 am
P6/FD4 causes controversy because, despite the protestations of the Patent Examination Board (PEB), some believe that P6/FD4 fails to assess a candidate's fitness to practice. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:13 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Delsman CA Anti-SLAPP Cases Involving Consumer Reviews as Matters of Public Concern Dentist Review on Yelp Gets Partial Anti-SLAPP Protection–Wong v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 2:01 am
The tubes were available for purchase, and so disclosure of the use of the tube enabled use of the invention.InfringementHHJ Hacon proceeded to consider the issue of infringement, applying the principles of claim interpretation set out by Actavis v Eli Lilly ([2017] UKSC 48), as reviewed by the Court of Appeal in Icescape v Iceworld (IPKat post here). [read post]