Search for: "Acosta"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
Department of Labor (DOL) Secretary Alexander Acosta has already issued notices that the Obama administration’s overtime and tip-sharing rules will be revised. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
Department of Labor (DOL) Secretary Alexander Acosta has already issued notices that the Obama administration’s overtime and tip-sharing rules will be revised. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
Until recently, Secretary Alexander Acosta was the only senior official at the DOL. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
Until recently, Secretary Alexander Acosta was the only senior official at the DOL. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 1:12 pm
This restoration of opinion letters comes as little surprise, as Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta first announced that the DOL would return to the policy of issuing opinion letters in June 2017. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 8:28 am
Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta (By US Department of Labor (L-17-05-01-C-AlexanderAcosta-023-E) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons)I have often blogged about the usefulness of USDOL (or any DOL) Opinion Letters and I have lamented that this procedure was stopped under President Obama. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 8:05 am
Seyfarth Synopsis: Despite the major ideological shift that occurred within American politics in 2017, government-initiated litigation continued to flourish if not increase even after with the election of the pro-business Trump Administration. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 6:26 am
" Is this in direct response to Acosta — a kind of I'm not the king, you're the king? [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 6:01 am
Justice Alex Acosta? [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 3:01 am
Alex Acosta and team — is to ditch its predecessor’s horrible overtime rules [Juliet Eilperin, Washington Post on opinion letters and internships] DoL rollback of Obama rules on tip pooling is fully justified [Christian Britschgi] “A Seattle Game-Changer? [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 7:42 am
When structured properly, ESOPs often can be a great fit for a company and its employees. (1) Acosta v. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 9:51 am
Facts: This case (Acosta v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:48 am
Carlos Acosta has been the Inspector General for the Prince George’s County Police Department since 2012. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 2:46 pm
Acosta, 748 So.2d 1089, 1090 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (“[P]roof of the claimant’s violation of the employer’s known policy did not rise to the level of disqualifying misconduct connected with work. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:43 am
Anderson, Anna Caroline Müller & Nivedita Sen, Competition policy in WTO accessions: filling in the blanks in the international trading system Tatiana Yanguas Acosta, Geographical indications in the accessions landscape Diwakar Dixit, WTO accession commitments on agriculture: lessons for WTO rule-making Nannan Gao & Fangying Zheng, The WTO-plus obligations: dual class or a strengthened system? [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 2:53 am
Ring (who take a very different view of the provision) via Caron/TaxProf] Federalist Society convention video on future of federal workplace agencies with Alex Acosta and Nicholas Geale of DoL, Victoria Lipnic of EEOC, Philip Miscimarra of NLRB; “‘Mistake’ in Pennsylvania homecare contract would have helped unions in fight over healthcare workers” [Sean Higgins, Washington Examiner; Cato podcast with David Osborne and Caleb O. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 10:46 am
In August 2012, the plaintiff was working for Acosta when she fell and injured herself on Wal-Mart’s premises. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 10:46 am
In August 2012, the plaintiff was working for Acosta when she fell and injured herself on Wal-Mart’s premises. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:59 am
Regarding the second employee, there was evidence he was terminated because he was the grandfather of the injured employee and provided testimony to OSHA (Acosta v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 1:16 pm
During a hearing before the House Education and the Workforce Committee on November 15, Secretary Acosta indicated that OSHA is continuing to examine the rule. [read post]
