Search for: "Amendment to Florida Rules of Judicial Administration"
Results 361 - 380
of 575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2013, 2:08 am
” Finally, Justice Stevens also objected to the way the ruling avoided the rule of judicial restraint. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
Incumbent federal officeholders cannot receive compensation from campaign funds under the updated rule. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 3rd District. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Ciavarella[17] pulls no punches: With utter disdain for the rule of law, defendants Mark A. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:37 pm
JURISDICTION AND VENUE The Third Judicial District Court in and for Salt Lake County, State of Utah, has jurisdiction of the claims asserted below, pursuant to the provision of §78A-5-102, Utah Code Ann. (1953 as amended). [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:51 am
Honorable mentions * The Trump Administration’s terrible information security practices. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:00 am
In a sharply worded letter, the senators said they supported a proposal by a judicial ethics panel that would ban membership among judges in the conservative legal group. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
But their rule-breaking remarks may still be exempt under Facebook’s newsworthiness exemption. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
The lawsuit charges he “is wrongfully retaining Presidential records that are the property of the United States, and which constitute part of the permanent historical record of the prior administration. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:50 am
" Stevens leaves a diverse legal legacy, authoring landmark decisions ranging from Reno v ACLU, the 1997 decision that anointed the internet with broad First Amendment protection, to Chevron v Natural Resources Defense Council [1984], which has guided the administrative state ever since. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
Florida Department of Environmental Protection and explores the significance of Justice Stevens’s apparent recusal. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 3:00 am
The House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure’s report found the General Services Administration did not track foreign government payments to the hotel or identify the origins of more than $75 million in loans made by Trump and his family to shore up its troubled finances. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
§ 1369(b)(1)(F), the portion of the Clean Water Act’s judicial review provision that requires that agency actions “in issuing or denying any permit” under Section 1342 be reviewed by the court of appeals, to decide petitions to review the waters-of-the-United-States rule, even though the rule does not “issu[e] or den[y] any permit” but instead defines the waters that fall within Clean Water Act jurisdiction. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:29 am
The court's reasoning tracks the reasoning of appellate courts in California, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, and Washington, but is much more detailed, and is a welcome addition to that body of precedents. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Smith, No. 06-3112 In a case addressing the constitutionality of a vehicle impoundment under the Fourth Amendment in circumstances in which there was no standardized policy regarding the impoundment and towing of vehicles, the circuit court rules that the constitutionality of a community caretaking impoundment is judged by directly applying the Fourth Amendment, which protects people against "unreasonable" searches and seizures. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
This system standardizes taxes to reduce administrative and compliance costs: It requires a single, state level tax administration, uniform definitions of products and services, simplified tax rate structures, and other uniform rules. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 5:31 am
Federal courts is an advanced course in procedural law, with a focus on the jurisdiction of the federal courts and the relation between federal courts, state courts, and administrative agencies. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am
Hicks in 1987 through Florida v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Leveto, No. 05-4753 Conviction for federal income tax fraud is affirmed where: 1) defendant had knowingly and voluntarily waived his Sixth Amendment right to counsel and, once properly waived, this right is no longer absolute; and 2) there was no reversible error in several rulings regarding a warrant and summons. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
The court referred to a broader 2021 ruling against UK surveillance practices. [read post]
