Search for: "Amendment to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure" Results 361 - 380 of 529
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The court also held that defendants were not entitled to a new trial because the errors they asserted in Question Two of the special verdict form and the verdict itself were not properly preserved for appellate review. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 2:05 pm by Leslie Sammis
Motion for Post-Conviction Relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 which must normally be filed within two years of the sentencing or the conviction being affirmed on appeal whichever occurred later. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
Of the thirty or so cases around the country – challenging a variety of provisions, not just the individual mandate, on multiple grounds – five have already reached the appellate level on the merits of the individual mandate issue (a few others have done so on standing and other procedural grounds): those brought by Virginia and Liberty University, respectively, in the Fourth Circuit; by the Thomas More Law Center in the Sixth Circuit; by Florida, twenty-five… [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 9:00 am by Vivian Persand
In October 2009, a post on the Property Insurance Coverage Law Blog titled Florida's Third District Rules When a Bad Faith Claim Can be Filed Following Appraisal evaluated the case of State Farm Florida Ins. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 9:00 am by Vivian Persand
In October 2009, a post on the Property Insurance Coverage Law Blog titled Florida's Third District Rules When a Bad Faith Claim Can be Filed Following Appraisal evaluated the case of State Farm Florida Ins. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am by cdw
The concerns raised by Brown regarding a child witness’s testimony are adequately addressed by our Rules of Evidence. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:16 pm by Dan Bushell
  Here are the Rules that have been amended: Appellate Procedure Rule 9.050 is being added to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.050. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:16 pm by Dan Bushell
  Here are the Rules that have been amended: Appellate Procedure Rule 9.050 is being added to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.050. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  Sometimes, these challenges have been based on First Amendment claims. [read post]
27 May 2011, 5:17 am
Every cert grant in a Fourth Amendment case by the Roberts Court creates serious risk of damage to the Fourth Amendment and individual privacy in America. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am by Law Lady
The order comes just weeks after the appellate court granted the Obama administration's request to expedite the case.The government hopes to overturn U.S. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:51 pm by Dan Bushell
The Florida Supreme Court is About to Join the Fray Then there’s the 4th DCA’s decision, En Banc, to certify to the Florida Supreme Court a “question of great public importance” (for jurisdiction-conferring purposes under Rule 9.030 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure) in Pino v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm by Joel R. Brandes
No. 100-300, 102 Stat. 445 (1988); codified as amended at 42 USC ss11601-11610; See 42 U.S.C. s 11601 (b) for the congressional intent. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm by cdw
Maples involves “whether a failure to satisfy a state procedural rule in a criminal case could be excused if the convicted individual was blameness for the failure, and the state had some role in the default. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:24 am by Richard Hornsby
There is also nothing prohibiting Judge Perry from appointing additional co-counsel; and I would argue, that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.112(e) required Judge Perry to appoint qualified lead counsel and co-counsel prior to Ms. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 1:54 pm by Hopkins
The Florida Legislature also wants to take away from the courts the drafting and approval of rules and procedures used by the courts in processing cases. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 1:54 pm by Hopkins
The Florida Legislature also wants to take away from the courts the drafting and approval of rules and procedures used by the courts in processing cases. [read post]