Search for: "Amendments To Rules Regulating the Bar"
Results 361 - 380
of 4,891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2018, 7:25 am
The rules, set to take effect on January 1, are among the most stringent efforts in the nation to regulate the burgeoning industry. [read post]
28 May 2019, 6:56 pm
Given the growth of criminal law and government regulation to cover “so much previously innocent conduct,” “almost anyone can be arrested for something. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 7:51 am
Unlike most other areas of the law, the court has few recent cases to guide its ruling. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 11:36 am
Ahhhh, I do love the smell of a First Amendment win against restrictive bar rules. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:26 am
A three-judge panel ruled against him. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
The court sustained an injunction barring the EEOC and the Department of Justice (which has a role in enforcing Title VII with respect to public employers) from treating the Guidance as binding until notice-and-comment procedures are followed.The State of Texas ruling is hard to understand on a number of grounds. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 5:25 am
and FTC Objects to Attorney-Advertising Rule (Go Figure!) [read post]
19 May 2023, 3:40 pm
It held that the slogan statutes more closely resemble rules about election mechanics than restrictions on political speech because they regulate ballots, a core component of election machinery. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 9:04 am
Previously, Section 11028 spoke to English-only workplace rules, providing that such rules were permissible where “justified by business necessity” and if employees were notified of the rule and the consequences for violating it. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 2:35 pm
The post Eighth Circuit Rules Eviction Moratoria are Likely to be Takings Requiring Compensation Under the Fifth Amendment appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 7:42 am
The court also found that SB 4 violated the First Amendment. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
Departments of Labor (DOL), Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Treasury (Treasury) amended the Affordable Care Act (ACA) rules on preventive care coverage, which require first-dollar coverage of certain listed preventive services. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 5:07 am
Hynes On May 16, 2011, the Department of State (“Department”) published its final rule in the Federal Register amending provisions of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”) regarding the transfer of ITAR controlled defense articles (including technical data) to dual and third-country nationals employed by approved foreign end-users. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 12:04 pm
The cause came before the court on April 23, 2020, where the court granted the plaintiffs’ request for an injunction and entered a temporary restraining order barring the emergency amendment. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 6:42 am
This request is closely tied to NASNA’s second request, which asks the Commission to amend Section 9.4 and Section 9.5 of its rules to provide clarity and establish deadlines around the ongoing NG911 transition. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:23 pm
The Constitution’s 21st Amendment gives states the power to regulate the distribution of alcohol into and within a state, while a doctrine known as the dormant commerce clause (derived from the Constitution’s commerce clause) bars states from discriminating against interstate commerce. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:03 am
United States, a unanimous court reversed a lower court ruling that had barred a man who could no longer possess firearms after pleading guilty to a felony from transferring his weapons to a friend.... [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 2:15 pm
appeared first on Yale Journal on Regulation. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 11:00 am
Federal preemption has barred claims under state law for injuries allegedly caused by pharmaceutical products, so a ruling stating that chemical manufacturers and suppliers are not necessarily shielded from liability by federal regulations is welcome news. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm
City of Hialeah; (2) whether New York’s mandate interferes with the autonomy of religious entities, in violation of the religion clauses of the First Amendment; and (3) whether — if, under the rule announced in Smith, the free exercise clause of the First Amendment allows states to demand that religious entities opposing abortions subsidize them — Smith should be overruled. [read post]
