Search for: "American Consumer Products Corporation" Results 361 - 380 of 3,025
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2012, 8:26 pm
When corporations manufacture a product, they have the responsibility for testing that product to ensure its safety before the product is put on the market and sold to consumers. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 7:48 am by Bob Ambrogi
Later this month, ALM, the publisher of Law.com, The American Lawyer, Corporate Counsel, and other legal publications, will release a product designed to address that challenge: Legal Radar, a website and app that uses artificial intelligence to rapidly deliver legal news personalized to the reader. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 6:22 am by Bill Stalter
  An interest bearing MyPA may serve as a short term introduction to another preneed product, but a viable long term non-guaranteed product will need proactive asset management. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:03 pm
Under strict liability, the manufacturer of the product is liable for injuries caused if the product harms consumers, even if the manufacturer was not directly negligent in making that product defective. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:57 pm by Coral Beach
The Sac City, IA, bread company posted the recall on its blog June 17, warning consumers to not use its American Original Beer Bread mix because it might contain E. coli O121. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:52 pm by Ronald F. Wick
Its rationale is that states with more lenient consumer protection laws than California are entitled to the “business-friendly” atmosphere they have legislated, so that they will attract the business of corporations such as Honda. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 7:17 pm by Frank Pasquale
When Tom Friedman tells Americans that they need to become “ten times more productive,” he’s trying to inspire a rugged individualism of self-improvement. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 7:00 am by Clark
…written by one of the commissars of the Consumer Product Safety Commission. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:55 am by Frank Pasquale
As Daniel JH Greenwood recently observed, “for a generation, American workers’ wages have lagged behind their productivity gains. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 5:46 am
Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance (discussed on the Forum here) and Will Corporations Deliver to All Stakeholders? [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 1:33 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
There aren’t definitive state cases, but the DNJ has come to this conclusion; here the court rejects the specious argument that Citizens United bars such discrimination against the corporate form, which isn’t even relevant because corporations who are consumers of falsely advertised products/services have standing under the NJCFA.Defamation: Nothing defamatory here, just opinion. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Dynascan Corp., 38 F.3d 1161 (11th Cir.1994) (per curiam) (affirming extraterritorial application of the Lanham Act where a U.S. corporation purchased infringing products to sell exclusively to consumers in South America). [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 12:09 pm
Forced arbitration clauses allow corporations like General Mills to kick customers out of court and funnel them into an un-American dispute mill that is rigged, secretive and final -- and that denies you ANY ability to appeal, no matter how abusive the process.If General Mills is not accountable, their customers are not safe.Take action now! [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:56 am by Frank Pasquale
As Daniel JH Greenwood recently observed, "for a generation, American workers’ wages have lagged behind their productivity gains. [read post]
  I’m well aware of your efforts to derail prior attacks by the business community on the American consumer’s ability to hold corporate wrongdoers accountable. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 6:28 am
Here is an excerpt from the opinion, which was authored by Judge Posner:The suits are a series of mostly identical class actions on behalf of all Americans descended from slaves with whom one or more of the defendants or their corporate predecessors may have been directly or indirectly involved.. . .The limitations that Article III places on the right to sue in a federal court require us to affirm (though striking "with prejudice"), on the basis of lack of standing, the… [read post]