Search for: "Application of Northern States Power Company"
Results 361 - 380
of 547
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2013, 4:30 pm
It also allowed physical searches of any agent of a foreign power—including U.S. persons—for initial periods of 45 days, with extensions by application in increments of 45 days. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:56 pm
Under the FDCA, a pharmaceutical company must specify the intended uses of a drug in its new drug application to the FDA. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Concern expanded to software applications used to infringe copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The companies are asserting a right to exclude medications for women from the company’s health plan according to their religious worldview. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:49 am
However, in a sweeping 18-page August 19, 2013 opinion (here), Northern District of Georgia Richard W. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
The battle over the BDCP is taking on the characteristics of the typical Northern vs. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 7:57 am
This could help pharmaceutical companies – some time after 31 December 2016. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:22 am
Unless specifically indicated, I’m not commenting on this particular Voltage case at this time.The BMG decision is presumably still the applicable law in Canada. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:20 am
This way the application processing unit can save power when not needed, but incoming calls (including voice-over-IP calls) won't be missed. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
The District Court for the Northern District of Georgia dismissed the FTC’s complaint for failure to state a claim, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 1:45 am
The decision obviously will have wide applicability to many other types of commercial and consumer agreements. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 1:45 am
The decision obviously will have wide applicability to many other types of commercial and consumer agreements. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 4:00 pm
The ruling is novel, and vitally important for companies facing the prospects of governmental enforcement litigation with state agencies. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
The Media Reform Coalition argues that the clauses are crucial: “Without a requirement to show damage, there is a danger that companies can use libel courts as an arm of their PR operations, simply suppressing what they don’t want in the public sphere“. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 10:16 pm
"How's my porn company doing?" [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:49 am
Navasca, United Stated District Court for the Northern District of California, No. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 5:49 am
Navasca, United Stated District Court for the Northern District of California, No. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
When a local company in Northern Ireland later started adopting a similar type of livery for its filling stations (arguing that green was a colour associated with both care for the environment and Irishness), BP sued them for both trade mark infringement and passing off. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am
There is no stated necessity that the need or the risk be significant or substantial. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Furthermore, the applicant had failed to include this claim in his application: the Court clarified that failure to state a claim in the application cannot be compensated by introducing the claim at the hearing (unless the plea is based on matters of law or of fact which come to light in the course of the procedure), as stated by Article 48(2) of the Rules of procedure of the General Court and held in previous case law (Case T‑246/06, Redcats SA v… [read post]
