Search for: "Application of Ware"
Results 361 - 380
of 440
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2010, 4:35 pm
This Blawg Review comes to you from the Canadian Trademark Blog, resident in Vancouver, British Columbia – a blawg run by several of the talented trademark law practitioners at Clark Wilson LLP. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:00 am
The applicant’s new evidence consisted of the affidavits of five clients, which all showed the transfer of wares with the trademark. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:19 pm
The two proposed Practice Notices address the application of 12(1)(b) to professional designations and to abbreviations, acronyms and initials. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 11:10 am
Apple controls what applications can be distributed, it tracks each user that installs the application, and of course, takes a nice commission from the sale of each app. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 12:38 am
Furthermore, because Nevada does not have a state income tax, municipalities raise capital with users fees (which are essentially taxes disguised as application/licensing fees). [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) Global Global – General Why no one is reading this post (IP Think Tank) It’s the silly season but this is ridiculous (IP Think Tank) Year end wishes for 2010… [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm
On the basis of the affidavit submitted by the Applicant, the Hearing Officer concluded that use of the mark in association with “textile fabrics” had been shown, but not use in association with the remaining wares. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:28 pm
The application was granted in March 2007. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:05 am
The inclusion of a descriptive terms such as “shoes” which in Office Holdings describes what both parties sell, and “online,” which describes one of the ways in which the parties sell their wares does not create a distinctive mark. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 6:12 pm
The nature of the wares and services and the nature of the trade were similar. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 3:06 am
For example, an Official Mark applies to all wares and services, does not need to be renewed and can only be challenged through an application for judicial review. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:50 am
Finally, Bilski deals with the difficult issue of convincing the Court that its patent application is patentable. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 2:33 am
They don’t want to undermine their market success, and thus will be tempted to opt for gradual rather than radical innovation when designing the next version of their successful wares. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
CUSTOMS logo barred by sections 2(a) and 2(b): In re Peter S Herrick, PA (TTABlog) TTAB enters judgment on the pleadings against applicant who admitted non-use of its mark Esprit IP Limited v Mellbeck Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) WYHA? [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:52 am
First consider some sample recommendations (note particularly the Ontario Chamber and Conference Board recommendations which include arguable plagiarism problems): Recommendation CACN Ontario Chamber IP Council Conference Board Create an IP Council Establish a federal Intellectual Property Coordination Council consisting of senior civil servants and IP rights holders whose key… [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 3:06 am
Accordingly, I would allow the appeal, and direct the Registrar to allow Glenora's application for the registration of GLEN BRETON.s. 10 provides that:10. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:20 am
Perhaps unsurprisingly, appeals of that decision were filed by both parties–by the ACA, as to the application of Article 6ter, and by OHIM, that Article 6ter and the applicable Regulation applied only to wares. [read post]
29 May 2009, 4:23 pm
Today, the proprietor of Cupcake Stop, Lev Ekster, stopped by our office with his delicious wares. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:10 pm
When considering the nature of the wares and the channels of trade for the two marks, the Board found that although the PREOS and PROTOS drugs would be administered in very different forms (PREOS being self injected and PROTOS being dissolved in a glass of water) and could be aimed at different groups of patients, the description of the wares in the applications for both drugs covered identical wares and were not limited as to physical… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Waring Investments Inc., No. 08-60599 (5th Cir. [read post]
