Search for: "Arnold v. D"
Results 361 - 380
of 579
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2009, 6:44 am
Thomas D. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:15 am
This can be seen from last week's decision of Mr Justice Arnold (Chancery Division, England and Wales) in Golden Eye (International) Ltd and others v Telefonica UK Ltd, Consumer Focus intervening [2012] EWHC 723 (Ch), a decision that was written up so quickly by Eleonora Rosati for the 1709 Blog that the IPKat's good intentions to get down to writing about the same decision were temporarily swept away. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:36 am
Buckland & Arnold D. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 3:58 am
A female mortgage loan officer in Tennessee who was fired despite being the top sales performer survived the employer’s attempts to get her gender bias case tossed by providing evidence that her supervisor made comments showing discriminatory intent (Arnold v Reliant Bank, March 21, 2013, No. 3:11-cv-1083). [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:55 am
At first instance Mr Justice Arnold was of the opinion that the Regulation was acte clair, and upheld the IPO’s assessment of the relevancy of the sheep. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:12 am
In today’s case (Cairns v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 5:55 pm
Supreme Court has recently agreed to resolve this matter, in the case of Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 10:18 pm
Next it was Aparajita’s turn to come up with an incisive case review of Lupin Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Sevs. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:13 am
FC section 2102 (a)(2), 2105(d)(3). [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:33 am
Marbury v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 12:22 pm
Honabach, 2022-2023 Edition, D&O Liab. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm
Arnold H. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gooding, Maeve O’Connor, and William D. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gooding, Maeve O’Connor, and William D. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
Cognitive sophistication, as measured by SAT (Scholastic Aptitude Test) and the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) does not reduce the bias blind spot.[9]In other words, smart people also believe they are less susceptible to biases than others, but are in fact equally biased.Avoiding Hindsight Bias In Patentability Assessment Around The WorldThe second panel sought to show which approaches to reduce hindsight bias different jurisdictions had developed.Szepler, Yu, Klett, Arnold, Kalden, Bremi,… [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica)… [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Photo Productions was preceded by the earlier decision of Suisse Atlantique Societe d’Armement Maritime SA v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 4:18 am
Los precedentes eran Califano v. [read post]
