Search for: "Arnold v. United States"
Results 361 - 380
of 595
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2013, 11:28 am
Read more… Despite State Court Order, NJ Federal Court Finds Plaintiff Responsible for Conditional Payments On June 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey published its opinion in Taransky v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 4:34 am
PCAOB Chairman Doty remarked that the proposed standards - running to almost 300 pages - mark a "watershed moment" for auditing in the United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 3:43 am
In Vestergaard Frandsen and others v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:59 am
Reversed and Remanded.Case Name: TED NOBLES v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 8:58 am
, back on 7 May, Darren the Kat initiated an enthusiastic discussion of a patent law concept hitherto unknown to this blogger, "poisonous priority", this issue being triggered by Darren's analysis of Mr Justice Arnold's Patents Court decision in the coffee capsule case, Nestec v Dualit. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 9:52 am
Windsor (Defense of Marriage Act)In United States v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:05 am
After summarizing the law set out in the Supreme Court decisions in United Wire and Shutz v Werit, Arnold J applied the multi-factoral approach recently laid down by the Supreme Court in Shutz. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
There again, the peculiarly interesting state of trade mark law in the United Kingdom and, not far beyond it, in the territory of the European Economic Area, might be closer to the cause. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
California Dreaming Bodybuilder and actor Arnold Schwarzenegger had long been interested in politics, but as a moderate Republican (then still married to a prominent Democrat) in a state with a hard-right Republican base, he could not get nominated by the Republicans as dog-catcher. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 9:18 am
If interpreted that broadly, it should be held invalid as Judge Arnold determined today.The decision comes ahead of a trial scheduled by the Mannheim Regional Court for February 1, 2013, which will be the second trial (after a reopening of proceedings following the first one) in this Motorola v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
In considering whether an absence is temporary, courts have weighed: (1) the parent’s purpose in removing the child from the state, rather than the length of the absence, see Arnold v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:01 pm
" Randall Little and Joel Arnold on behalf of the United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:19 pm
Sanders v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:13 am
http://bit.ly/MtGmqK (Ralph Losey) Cloud Data Protection Offerings for eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/PDVUJj (Stephen Arnold) Computers Conquer Connect Four; Predictive Coding Next? [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:58 am
Before the Patents Court, Arnold J upheld the IPO’s assessment of the relevancy of the sheep; he saw no need to ask the CJEU what the SPC Regulation meant, since it was acte clair. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 2:39 pm
In Raw Films Ltd. v. [read post]
