Search for: "Arp v. Arp" Results 361 - 375 of 375
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
He had clerked for two federal judges, spent two years as an associate at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP in Wilmington, Del., then served as chief counsel for then-Gov. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:19 am by Kara OBrien
The following guest post was sent in by Brian Breheny, a Partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom and Practice Center Contributor. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:17 pm
For eleven stellar seasons, the CBS hit "The Jeffersons" told the hilarious story of George and Weezie, who had moved on up the socio-economic ladder to "a deluxe apartment in the sky. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Following another year of increasing focus on environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations by companies, investors and regulators alike, ESG appears to have cemented its position in the corporate landscape. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The Telegram TRO   Dating back to as early as 2014, the SEC began bringing enforcement actions relating to cryptocurrency, and with its October 11, 2019 filing of SEC v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
On January 24, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted final rules that impose significant additional procedural and disclosure requirements on initial public offerings (IPOs) by special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) and in business combination transactions involving SPACs (de-SPACs). [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
Current proposals include: (i) imposing a mandatory “cooling-off” period of 120 days for officers and directors, and 30 days generally, between when a plan is adopted or modified and when trading can commence; (ii) requiring directors and officers to personally certify to the company that they are not in possession of material nonpublic information at the time of adoption or modification of a plan; (iii) providing that the affirmative defense under Rule 10b5-1(c)(1) does not apply… [read post]