Search for: "Arthur Andersen" Results 361 - 380 of 507
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2008, 1:57 am
(CCH) ¶ 73, 272) and Commission Letter dated 2/14/89, responding to 3/29/88 Petition of Arthur Andersen & Co. and others. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 5:51 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, the California Supreme Court reaffirmed California's strong public policy against covenants not to compete. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:27 pm
., concerns that criminal sanctions would lead to an Arthur-Andersen-type bankruptcy.) [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:39 pm
Raymond Edwards was hired by Arthur Andersen as a tax manager in January 1997. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 10:42 pm
Arthur Andersen that the state legislature effectively restricted the ability of employers to prevent employees from working for competitors. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 7:20 am
Arthur Andersen, S147190, the unanimous court held that a state statute with roots in 19th century laws gives California workers great freedom to switch jobs, to compete against old employers and to solicit former clients. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 5:17 pm
In a 7-0 decision yesterday, the California Supreme Court held that a noncompetition agreement signed by a former Arthur Andersen CPA was invalid under California law. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:28 am
Arthur Andersen LLP  today and held that employee non-competition agreements are invalid, even if narrowly drawn, unless the agreement falls within a statutory exception. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 10:30 pm
Arthur Andersen and held that California law prohibits agreements restraining competition, regardless of how narrow or reasonable the restraint may be. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 10:03 pm
The Court disagreed with Anderson, and noted: We conclude that Andersen’s noncompetition agreement was invalid. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 6:10 pm
Arthur Andersen - read here -The Court flatly rejected the "limited" or "narrow" non-competition agreement as unlawful under Bus. and Prof. [read post]