Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability v."
Results 361 - 380
of 552
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
Koerner & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
Koerner & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm
Super. 2003) (applying rule to defense testimony in product liability case); Spino v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 2:32 am
Kaiser Cement & Gypsum Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:45 am
In re: Bisphenol-A Polycarbonate Plastic Products Liability Litigation, No. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:51 pm
The Court of Appeal in O’Neil ruled that defendants could be liable because they could have foreseen that the Navy would use asbestos-containing products in conjunction with the defendants’ products, but the defendants argue (and four California appellate courts have agreed) that they cannot be liable because they did not place the injury-causing asbestos products into the steam of commerce, and merely supplied components that the Navy… [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:13 pm
EVELYN NYE v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:27 am
Dyer v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:35 pm
Kaiser Cement & Gypsum Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:06 pm
By 2004, more than 24,000 claimants had filed asbestos bodily injury suits against Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corporation (“Kaiser”), as a result of their exposure to Kaiser’s asbestos products. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 8:53 am
Background As detailed here, in 2002, shareholders had filed a securities class action lawsuit against Halliburton and certain of its directors and officers, alleging that the company has misrepresented certain aspects of its financial condition, including the company’s exposure to potential liability from asbestos litigation and the company’s expected revenue from certain construction contracts. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:11 pm
ACE Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 7:51 am
” [Kevin Couch, Abnormal Use] Tags: product liability, South Carolina Related posts Update: Branham v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:01 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:38 am
Factual Background In Halliburton, the shareholder plaintiffs maintain that from 1999 to 2001, Halliburton made false and misleading statements that understated its asbestos liability and overstated its revenues. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 3:36 pm
Employer liability for non-employee harassment. 9. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd., 1986 WL 69060, at *6 (N.D. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
Terra Sec v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm
One of the legal "rules" here is the product-line successor liability rule. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:01 am
Morin v. [read post]
