Search for: "B. v. S."
Results 361 - 380
of 57,849
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2024, 5:06 pm
“As the record-breaking number of recoveries reflects, those who seek to defraud the government will pay a high price,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Boynton, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 2:34 pm
So holds today's Ninth Circuit opinion in Hunter v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 12:23 pm
Finally, the Supreme Court’s very recent decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 9:30 am
Earth Island Institute v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 7:49 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 7:47 am
Alsa Refinish LLC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 6:17 am
Angie’s Lists, Inc. d/b/a Angi (SD 7/18/2024) – Alejandra Reichard and Jonathan P. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 5:55 am
” Fox v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 2:59 am
The rule outlines prevention and control measures that must be taken in processing facilities to reduce the risk of contamination of ready-to-eat products.[5] B. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 7:23 pm
As we noted in a blog post published shortly after the Supreme Court’s decided SEC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 9:07 am
This is set out as follows, in Halsbury’s Laws of England, vol 34, para 1087, fn 13: “Supporting or opposing memorials or petitions purporting to be signed by petitioners as to which there is no proof of the signatures or evidence of the representations made to those who sign are inadmissible: Rector and Churchwardens of Capel St Mary, Suffolk v Packard [1927] P 289; Re Christ Church, Chislehurst [1947] 1 All ER 146 at 150–151, [1973] 1 WLR 1317 at 1321. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 8:55 am
Ortho-Tain, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 8:10 am
Cal.). in Loggins v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 7:51 am
Dominguez Ojeda v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 7:47 am
Article 3 (scope) and Chapter V (cross border transfers) of GDPR coexist and can apply together. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 7:08 am
Supreme Court case, Moore v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 6:57 am
Third, for 8(a) sole-source awards issued against MACs, regardless of whether the underlying MAC (1) is unrestricted, (2) set-aside (even if the underlying MAC itself was set-aside for 8(a) Participants), or (3) under the GSA’s FSS contracts, the concern must qualify as small for the size standard corresponding to the NAICS code assigned to the order or agreement as of the date of initial offer for and award of the order or agreement (per 13 C.F.R.… [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTE [1] Kahn v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 1:30 pm
Montera v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 1:05 pm
Vicarious Defendant A then pursues an indemnity claim against active Defendant B. [read post]