Search for: "BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.," Results 361 - 380 of 420
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2011, 7:49 pm
Bank of Am., N.A., 72 S.W.3d 779, 803 n.4 (Tex. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am by John Elwood
Bank of America, N.A., 13-1416), would be the vehicle for resolving whether an order denying confirmation of a bankruptcy plan is appealable. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
    OCC’s Letter on Uniform Federal Banking Standards On November 9, 2023, the General Counsel of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”) issued a letter to the CEOs of all national banks and federal savings associations (“FSAs”) addressing uniform federal banking standards.[13] In the letter, the OCC explains that it is aware that some states have passed laws or taken other actions that “purport to… [read post]
3 May 2010, 11:50 pm by Mandelman
  Fannie Mae was established to buy up home loans from banks thereby freeing up capital that could be lent out to other borrowers, and also to provide local banks with federal money to finance home mortgages. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
In the parties’ appeal, plaintiffs challenged (1) the grant of judgment in Maschmeyer’s favor or, alternatively, the amount of that judgment; (2) the amount of the judgment in CRDG’s favor; (3) the dismissal of plaintiffs’ other counts, including counts against defendants Anne Maschmeyer and Bank of America, N.A.; and (4) the denial of plaintiffs’ motions for leave to amend their complaint. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:26 pm
Bank of America, N.A., No. 07-3565 Dismissal of plaintiff's class action claims as preempted by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 is affirmed where: 1) plaintiffs alleged the same injuries as claimed by parties in a prior Eighth Circuit case, wherein the issue of preemption had already been ruled upon; and 2) plaintiffs failed to distinguish their case from the previous case. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:29 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Clarence Thomas follows Ginsburg with the opinion in Bank of America N.A. v. [read post]