Search for: "BOARD OF EDUC. v. Board of Elections"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,345
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:09 am
First, two members of the State Board of Education appealed in their official capacities. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am
In Maine Community Health Options v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 3:17 am
Grutter v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Board of Education, the modern movement defended segregated schools and wanted tax exemptions for them.The Religious Right has had enormous success undermining the public system of U.S. education, especially by building religious charter schools and encouraging vouchers. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 11:18 am
Arguing that a book is obscene helps evade First Amendment challenges, like the one at the center of Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 10:00 pm
Heidi participated in the seminal United States Supreme Court case, Pioneer v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:55 am
The local Board of Education, as a party in interest on the forfeiture, objected on the grounds that filing the motion was the unauthorized practice of law. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Norton describes Rust v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
The MA v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:49 am
The Supreme Court expanded Acton’s reach in Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:02 am
Hassel v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 2:57 pm
In late August 2018, the boardroom battle culminated with the Coleman faction’s call for O’Gara to “step aside from all operations at Wanu, relinquish his seat on the board and agree to waive his right to elect five of the seven members of the board. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 7:00 am
Citizen oversight boards are non-existent. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
But some seem to think that the Law Society should not act if, for example, lawyers elect not to serve clients based on a prohibited ground such as race. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Although Petitioner argued that the confrontation between himself and the other member of the Department constituted "harmless horseplay," it is undisputed that Petitioner causing an injury to that member, in violation of Department policy.Noting the "judicial review of an administrative penalty" is limited to whether the measure or mode of penalty or discipline imposed constitutes an abuse of discretion as a matter of law" the Appellate Division, citing Pell… [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
Employment Announcements (More details on the Job Board) The following are job announcements of potential interest to Lawfare readers. [read post]
