Search for: "Bayer v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2010, 8:53 am by Beck, et al.
But the court agreed with Bayer that the true test is whether there is "any reasonable possibility" of success in state court against the nondiverse defendant. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
  This so-called “[c]ommon-defense exception,” Walton v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:27 am
Oct. 15, 2008), a unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the summary judgment granted to Bayer by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, holding that Bayer’s settlement of patent litigation with a generic pharmaceutical manufacturer did not violate the antitrust laws. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 4:32 am by Sean Wajert
Bayer CropScience L.P., 563 F.3d 302 (8th Cir. 2009). [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 9:14 am
 He indicated that two companies have already made NMSP submissions: (i) DuPont and (ii) 2PI, and that ten others have provided letters of intent to participate: (i) BASF; (ii) Bayer; (iii) Dow; (iv) Evonik; (v) GE; (vi) Nanocyl; (vii) Nanophase; (viii) PPG; (ix) Sasol North America; and (x) Strem Chemical. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
 BackgroundIn July 2016 Bayer Intellectual Property (the Applicant) sough to register the figurative sign above as an EU trade mark. [read post]