Search for: "Be In, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al" Results 361 - 380 of 489
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm by Chris Castle
Other relevant reading should include Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale, Andreassen et al (2012). [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing.Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel… [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:45 pm
Material Girl Brand, LLC et al, Case No. 10-cv-6195 (C.D. [read post]
Since President Biden issued his July 2021 Executive Order on Competition, the antitrust agencies have made broad policy statements promising more aggressive enforcement and have initiated a number of high-profile enforcement actions. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
  OpenAI published a paper in 2020, for example, outlining a scaling analysis for AI models, finding that “language modeling performance improves smoothly and predictably as we appropriately scale up model size, data, and compute”; see Kaplan, McCandlish, et. al, “Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models,” online at:  2001.08361.pdf (arxiv.org). [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
(EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report Blog) District Court E D Texas: Ashcroft and Twombly do not require that complaint allege ‘how’ accused products infringe: WIAV Networks, LLC v 3Com Corp et al (Docket Report Blog) District Court N D California: 3-D computer graphics claims invalid under Bilski, Prometheus: FuzzySharp Technologies v 3DLabs Inc. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 9:01 pm
Deutsche Telekom AG et al, which involves 131 defendants (see post here). [read post]