Search for: "Beebe and Beebe" Results 361 - 380 of 573
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Barton Beebe: IP as enabling rather than incentivizing—a key insight. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm by Sonia Katyal
John’s University School of Law Veblen Brands and Invisible Hands: How Trademarks Create a Market for Suppressed Speech Commentator: Barton Beebe, NYU Law School Brett Frischmann, Cardozo Law School Intergenerational Progress (with Mark McKenna, Notre Dame Law School) Commentator: Joel Reidenberg, Fordham Law School James Grimmelmann, New York Law School A Bridge Too Far? [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 11:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Beebe’s point: why do courts react badly to this type of free riding? [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Kal Raustiala and Christopher Sprigman are well known as the authors of the book, The Knock-Off Economy: How Imitation Sparks Innovation (2012). [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Beebe: tests our basic assumptions about TM law. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:34 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Discussion of Redskins mark—Beebe predicts it will be invalidated. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:25 am by Colby Pastre
The current lower rate for groceries is part of a series of changes, starting with a 3 percent rate in 2007, which was a campaign promise of then-Governor Mike Beebe (D). [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:51 am
Figures obtained by The Sun using the Freedom of Information Act reveal the Beeb splashed out £34,851 on bashes for TV crews and £30,375 for radio staff. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Barton Beebe: Questions about consumers—very difficult to focus on one area without crossing over into others. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 4:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Barton Beebe, NYU School of Law Partial to US tradition/nature of mark as giving us a use requirement. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:22 am
Professors Barton Beebe and Jeanne Fromer explored the arbitrary application of §2(a) of the Lanham Act in both an Amicus brief and subsequent law review article; identifying inconsistent application even with regards to marks resembling “FUCT,” they showed that the PTO discriminates based on the viewpoints it endorses through registration. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 11:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Beebe: But for the TM paper we began with, papers are unified by struggle to distinguish b/t worlds of subjective and objective. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
This is apparently a viable business proposition, probably because, whilst in theory there are no limits to signs that can constitute trade marks, in practice there is a finite supply of signs that are in actual fact suitable and attractive for use as a trade mark [an argument developed in more detail in a recent study by Professors Beebe and Fromer].Courts have been able to adequately deal with these kinds of abusive practices by weaponizing the bad faith requirement. [read post]