Search for: "Bell v. Page"
Results 361 - 380
of 653
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2012, 6:47 pm
The court here began its analysis by noting that notice pleading standards are governed by Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:34 am
Finally, In an August 21, 2012 opinion, Central District of California Judge James V. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:55 am
With all the recent buzz in Canada around disclaimers, the general impression test and performance claims (including the recent Bell, Nivea, Richard v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
An earlier version of this page is also available in Belorussian, thanks to the translation by Martha Ruszkowski. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
., v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:54 am
Bell Canada. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 12:24 pm
Of course, with the recently decided Richard v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:37 pm
Time (a deceptive contest mail-out case in which the Supreme Court of Canada considered the meaning of the “general impression test” for the purposes of the Quebec Consumer Protection Act), the Bell advertising case (which involved allegations by the Competition Bureau that certain price claims by Bell were false or misleading, and not cured by disclaimers) and the landmark Yellow Pages case (in which over C $9 million in penalties were ordered to be paid by… [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:33 am
She explained that Cincinnati Bell retains these records for about seven days. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:12 am
Or Morse v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:59 pm
” My presentation will be on recent misleading advertising law developments and trends (“Misleading Advertising Trends & Tips”), with a PowerPoint presentation and paper highlighting recent cases including Rogers, Bell, Yellow Pages, Richard v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:32 pm
” Yellow Pages. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
Journalism and regulation The PCC has not upheld Bell Pottinger Group’s complaint against the Independent for publishing reports on the company’s public relations and lobbying methods. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:24 am
MacDonald v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:16 am
Bell Canada decision also offered an exceptionally expansive approach to research under fair dealing. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:49 am
Bell – song previews, Alberta v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 12:13 pm
The Canadian decisions could have come straight out of the pages of the Hargreaves Review. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:13 am
Bell - song previews, Alberta v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:13 am
Bell - song previews, Alberta v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:05 pm
Stateside, the first three chapters examine how the fundamental US/UK differences in attitude towards freedom of speech came about – principally with the bell tolling for reputational rights in 1964 when the case of New York Times v Sullivan (an index stalwart for practitioners) decided that, where allegations concern official conduct, a public official cannot bring a defamation claim unless able to show ‘actual malice’: the defamation law equivalent of the… [read post]
