Search for: "Black v. Territory"
Results 361 - 380
of 503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
This is the first appellate decision on the territorial reach of GDPR. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:42 am
AC's words are in black italics. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 3:06 pm
The Nuremberg International Military Tribunal addressed the issue of pre-emptive strikes in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:49 pm
Great black letter law, but not easy to apply to your client’s case . . . or any other set of facts. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:36 am
Zelenskyy appears to have made his position clear, remaining determined to hold onto the territory and yielding not an inch to Russia. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:36 pm
Rehnquist in Herrera v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
The PCC also published the following “resolved” cases on 25 November: Sir Alan Davies Daily Mail, Clause 10; Kenneth Brewster The Sun, Clause 1; Adam Bradford The Star (Sheffield), Clause 1; Karen Coleman Brentwood Gazette, Clause 1; CLEAR The Sun, Clause 1; Mrs Maria Blamires Daily Mail, Clause 5; Mrs Maria Blamires Daily Mirror, Clause 5; Lord Triesman The Mail on Sunday, Clauses 1, 3 and 10; Resolved – London Borough of Sutton v Sutton [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am
” Fanworks provide incredible benefits in literacy, sexuality education, language learning, community building, and other good things that come from making something you love and sharing it with other people who might just love it too.On the content v. tech distinction that Maria Strong made: we consider ourselves content folks who use tech. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:59 pm
His view may be that Adarand and Loving v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:37 am
Yesterday, President Obama continued his push for the Iran deal in a speech at American University---a site likely chosen in order to draw parallels to a speech President John F. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:37 am
Yesterday, President Obama continued his push for the Iran deal in a speech at American University---a site likely chosen in order to draw parallels to a speech President John F. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm
In a session cut short by a stay from the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the military commission in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 10:27 am
Supreme Court cases, Moe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
"[16] But Claiborne Hardware had no occasion to decide whether a person's not dealing with someone based on that someone's race was itself protected by the First Amendment, because it was clear that Mississippi law did not prohibit such private choices not to deal.[17] Under Mississippi law, whites could generally refuse to deal with blacks, and blacks could refuse to deal with whites. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:18 pm
, Some Horwitzian Themes in the Law and History of the Federal Courts 17 Barbara Aronstein Black, Some Contract History: About Samuel Williston 18 Constance Backhouse, Anti-Semitism and the Law in Québec City: The Plamondon Case, 1910–15 19 Katherine V. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:29 pm
And the argument will veer into some uncharted territory. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 3:49 am
Mosunic v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:33 am
Although the Supreme Court rejected the habeas-stripping provisions as unconstitutional in Boumediene v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 am
’” It is time for Professor Cohen to be educated, and I am happy to do it: In the subtle sexism case of Hopkins v. [read post]
