Search for: "Board of Trade v. United States" Results 361 - 380 of 2,207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 2:04 am by John L. Welch
The WTO defense was equally useless: the Board pointed out that the "trademark registration opposition system in the United States provides equal treatment for all opposers and applicants, regardless of their national origin or status in the United States. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:54 am by Joy Waltemath
Michigan’s current version of its Fair and Open Competition in Governmental Construction Act (FOCGCA), in which the state made an across-the-board determination not to require contractors on public construction projects not to enter project labor agreements (PLAs) was not preempted by the NLRA, ruled a divided Sixth Circuit (Michigan Building and Construction Trades Council v Snyder, September 6, 2013, Rogers, J). [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Board of Education might not have been possible had the justices been concerned with the public opinion of their constituents. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:22 am
Finally, the Board noted that Applicant Laux's identification of goods includes no limitation as to channels of trade. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:19 am
Briefly, Fredreka Schouten at USA Today writes that a Court ruling in favor of the petitioners in Citizens United may drastically alter 2010 state gubernatorial elections by loosening restrictions on previously prohibited corporate and union donations, while the Boston Globe reports that the firefighters in Ricci v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am by Robert B. Milligan
Specifically, the webinar involved a discussion of non-compete and trade secret issues in Europe and China as compared to the United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:24 pm by Nikki Siesel
You can find guidance, under §1207.01 of the Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (The rules that govern trademark practice at the United States Patent & Trademark Office). [read post]
Case date: 17 March 2021 Case number: No. 19-2316 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
In addition to meeting “at the call of the United States Trade Representative,” ITACs prepare reports for the President, Congress, and the Trade Representative on whether proposed trade agreements provide for “equity and reciprocity within” the committees’ sector. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by David Wagner
California’s Cap-and-Trade Program (Todd Maiden, San Francisco) In October 2011, the California Air Resources Board approved final regulations implementing a “cap-and-trade” program under the state’s climate law (more commonly referred to by its legislative bill number, “AB 32”). [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 4:49 pm by Bona Law PC
Lately, the US Supreme Court has narrowed the doctrine, including for state licensing boards that seek its protection when sued under the antitrust laws (North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 8:47 am
Assistant Solicitor General Eric Miller appeared next on behalf of the United States as an amicus curiae supporting the respondent. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:34 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
In a recent appeal to the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, administrative trademark judges said yes (and yes). [read post]