Search for: "Booker" Results 361 - 380 of 3,241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2008, 1:29 pm
In this article, I explore post-Booker sentencing cases in the courts of appeals. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:29 am by Ernie Svenson
 Booker won easily in 2006 because of his persistence. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 7:12 am
This local article about an interesting sentencing hearing spotlights a number of challenging conceptual issues that surround federal resentencings in the post-Booker world. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
  Despite lots and lots of predictions that Congress would respond to Blakely and Booker in all sorts of ways â€â [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:16 am
In 2006, he petitioned pro se for a writ of audita querela to make a collateral Booker challenge to his sentence. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 3:19 pm
(Booker is 49 and never married.) [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 5:21 am
"Said Cory Booker, quoted in "6 key moments from Cory Booker’s CNN town hall" (Vox).Baby bonds? [read post]
10 Oct 2004, 12:56 pm
The Circuit remanded the case to the district court in light of Blakely and Booker, and the district court ordered her released. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 3:26 am
Formally joining other circuits in limiting the reach of Blakely and Booker, the First Circuit in US v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 3:29 pm by familoo
I have written two posts: “Brought to Booker” and more recently “Booker Booby Prize” and “Booker v Bellamy Round 2“. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:19 pm
A comment on the WaPo article, "Cory Booker and his ‘boo,’ Rosario Dawson, take their relationship on the campaign trail. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:25 am by Brian Leiter
Big players at Wall Street firms gave nothing to Sanders and Warren, but lots to Booker, Gillibrand, and Harris. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm by Francine Kershaw
Senators Cory Booker (D-NJ), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Tom Carper (D-DE), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) along with Rep. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 9:52 am
Booker [opinion, text] does not provide for special consideration of changes in sentencing guidelines during U.S.C. [read post]