Search for: "Born v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 4,821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2010, 7:38 am
He was born and raised in Connecticut. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:23 am
The complaint (full text) in Maddonna v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 2:55 pm
In The Queen (on the Application of Crowter) v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 12:22 pm
Dillard v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:30 pm
The case of Regan v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 8:17 am
Gay Male Couple Pushing Children In Buggy Through WoodsIn 2017, the Appellate Division, First Department, in New York became the first state appeals court to recognize that there is a “presumption of legitimacy” to a child born to a married same-sex male couple, i.e. the couple has the same parental rights that biological parents. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 8:27 am
Last fall, a panel of the Seventh Circuit handed down Exodus Refugee Immigration, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
Background The Claimant, Mrs Tolley, born in 1952 and a British national, had paid National Insurance contributions from 1967–1984, and some further contributions thereafter until 1993/1994. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:32 am
In Brough v Law [2011] EWCA Civ 1183, decided today, the Court of Appeal considered the effect of the parents' reconciliation upon a child maintenance assessment, with reference to the provisions of the Child Support Act 1991 as operative in 1999.The Facts: The parents were married, and had a son, born in 1996. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 8:12 pm
In State v Duroseau and State v Delgado, the NJ appellate courts held that a foreign born, non-citizen defendant must be informed by defense counsel and the trial court of the immigration consequences of pleading guilty to a criminal offense. [read post]
WA: State's failure to show how close defendant was to car was a failure of proof on search incident
20 Nov 2008, 6:05 am
State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:53 am
Roberts states the doctrine in the one-line form that Chief Justice Rehnquist used in Nixon v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:21 am
In Zivotofsky v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 11:30 am
In IRAP and Hawaii v. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 10:09 am
Additional Resources: Simmonds v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
This case would have presented no Fourth Amendment problem if the appellant, who, if challenged, would have borne the burden of proof on standing, Rakas v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 9:09 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 9:30 pm
This statutory clause directly contravenes the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Dred Scott v. [read post]
